Connecting the dots between water, energy, food, and ecosystems issues for Integrated Water Management in a changing climate

Global climate change creates critical challenges through increasing temperature, reducing snowpack, and changing precipitation for water, energy, and food, as well as for ecosystem processes at a regional scale. The water, energy, and food (WEF) nexus and related ecosystems have complex linkages with climate change implications.

The overall objectives of this white paper are to provide background on this important subject, and help local water managers and the public better understand:
*The ecosystem services for water, energy, and food in a changing climate.
*The water-energy nexus and related climate change mitigation actions in California.
*The energy used in California’s water sector and estimates of the energy intensity of regional water supplies.

Particularly, this paper largely consolidates the water-energy content originally published in California Water Plan Update 2013 (Volumes I, II, and III), which included:
*A framework for the energy intensity of California water systems.
*An estimate of the regional energy intensity of water supplies.
*Water-energy related climate change mitigation policies and actions.
*Climate change mitigation benefits and tradeoffs associated with each of the 30 Resource Management Strategies found in Volume III.

Furthermore, this paper will explore how water, energy, food, and climate change are interconnected with ecosystems, and why we need to understand these connections and identify the information gaps and related challenges and opportunities for ecosystem services in multiple sectors. Ecosystem services provide life support, goods, and natural resources in water, energy, and food, as well as environments. These are knowledge gaps for lack of conceptual framework and practices to interlink major climate change drivers of water resources with water-energy-food nexus and related ecosystem processes. This white paper provides information review and a conceptual framework to bridge these knowledge gaps.

The case studies summarized in this paper indicate there is a large variation in energy intensities for groundwater and federal, state, and local water supplies, both within each hydrological region and among the 10 hydrological regions in California. Regional decisions were critically important in addressing water-energy conflicts and meeting local climate change challenges. These examples can be applicable for the United States and other countries with similar climate change challenges that use diversity of regional water resources for energy and food production. Future interdisciplinary research and support could bridge information and data gaps that are important for using best management practices to obtain efficiency of water, energy, and food systems related to climate change.

The increased regional temperature, changes in snowpack and precipitation, and increased water stresses from drought can reduce ecosystem services and affect the water and energy nexus, agricultural food production, and fish and wildlife habitats in California. Regional decisions and practices in integrated management of water, energy, food, and related ecosystem processes are essential to adapting to and mitigating global climate change effects. Science and policy support for interdisciplinary research are critical in developing databases and tools for comprehensive analysis to fill knowledge gaps and address ecosystem service complexity, related natural resource investment, and integrated planning needs.

There are significant challenges and opportunities in California to use integrated water management for water, energy, food, and the environment related to climate change. The California Water Action Plan and California Water Plan Update provide a road map and resource management strategies to use integrated water resource management for the multiple benefits of these sectors. The examples and case studies in this white paper have been used to identify information gaps and address related complexity and challenges. Questions posed in this paper regarding water and energy related to the food production cycle need further research and discussion. Overall, we should identify opportunities for innovation and technologies with multiple benefits, evaluate tradeoffs, and address integrated challenges in water, energy, food, and the environment to adapt and mitigate climate change.